Method of interpretation of results of plane strain compression tests for evaluation of rheological parameters of materials

Method of interpretation of results of plane strain compression tests for evaluation of rheological parameters of materials

Bernard Kowalski

AGH University of Science and Technology.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2003.2.0040

Abstract:

Plane strain compression tests to investigate effects of heterogeneity of deformation for various initial specimen geometries have been carried out. Equations for correction of nominal strain and strain rate to slip line field strain and strain rate have been developed and applied to experimental flow stress – strain data. Investigation of the deformed specimens showed evidence of changing friction conditions during deformation, therefore, a simple function allowing friction to change was applied. The corrections eliminate the geometry effect observed in the initial data. Correction method for experimental load-displacement data has been developed and it was used in a two dimensional finite element model applied as a direct model in the inverse technique. Capabilities of the inverse technique when it is applied to plane strain compression tests were verified for various dimensions of the specimens and compared with the analytical correction method.

Cite as:

Kowalski, B. (2003). Method of interpretation of results of plane strain compression tests for evaluation of rheological parameters of materials. Computer Methods in Materials Science, 3(2), 97 – 110. https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2003.2.0040

Article (PDF):

Keywords:

,

References:

Boyer B., Massoni E., 200 I, Inverse Analysis for Identification of Parameters during Thermo-Mechanical Tests, Proc. Co11f. NUMIFORM ed., Mori K., Publ. A. Balkema, Toyohashi, 281-284.

Davenport S.B., Silk N.J., Sparks C.N., Sellars C.M., I 999, Development of Cons1i1u1ive Equalions for the Modeling of Hot Rolling, Mat. Sci. Techn., 16, 1-8.

Gclin J.C., Ghouali O., I 994, An Inverse Method for Determining Yiscoplastic Properties of Aluminum Alloys,J. 1’vlm. Proc. Techn., 45, 435-440.

Hand R.J., Foster S.R., Sellars, C. M, 2000, Temperature changes during hot plane strain compression testing, Mat. Sci Techn., 16, 442-450.

Kowalski, B., 2003, Method of interpretation of results of plane strain compression tests for evaluation of rheological parameters of materials, Praca doktorska, AGH, Kraków.

Kowalski B., Lacey A. J., Scllars C. M., 2003, Correction of plane strain compression data for the effects of inhomogeneous deformation, Mat. Sci. Techn. , l9.

Kowalski B., Sellars C.M., Pietrzyk M., 2000, Development of a Computer Code for the Interpretation of Results of Hot Plane Strain Compression Tests, ISIJ /11tematio11al, 40, 1230-1236.

Kowalski B., Wajda W., Pietrzyk M., Sellars C. M., 200 I, Sensitivity of constitutive equations on strain and strain rate inhomogeneity determined from FE modeling of plane strain compression tests, Proc. Conf. ESAFORM, ed. A.M. Habraken, Conference on Metal Forming, Liege, 561-564.

Mirza, M.S., Sellars, C.M., 200 I, Modeling the hot plane strain compression test. Part I – Effect of specimen geometry, strain rate, and friction on deformation, Mat. Sci. Techn., 17, 1133-1141.

Sellars, C.M., Sah, J.P., Beynon, J.H., Foster, S.R., l 976, Report on research work supported by SRC Grani B/RG/ 148 I, University of Sheffield, UK.

Sellars C.M., Tegart W.J. McG., I 966, La Relation Entre la Résistance et la Structure dans Déformation a Chaud, l\lle111. Sci. Re1c Met., 63, 73 1-746.

Shi H., Me Laren A. J., Sellars C.M., Shanani R., Bliongbroke R., 1997, Hot plane strain compression testing of aluminum alloys, J. Test. Eva/. , 25, 61-73.

Silk, N. J., van der Winden M. R., 1999, Interpretation of hot plane strain compression testing of aluminum specimens, Mat. Sci. Techn. , 15,295.

Szyndler D., Pietrzyk M., Kuziak R., 200 I, Estimation of Rheological and Friction Parameters in Hot Forming Processes as an Inverse Problem, Proc. 4th ESAFORM Conference Materials Forming, ed., Habraken A. M., Liege, 19 1-1 94 .