Numerical accuracy and efficiency of algorithms for springback calculation

Numerical accuracy and efficiency of algorithms for springback calculation

Dmytro Lumelskyy, Jerzy Rojek

Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences,ul. Pawińskiego 5B, 02-106 Warszawa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2011.2.0359

Abstract:

The objective of this work has been to study numerical accuracy and efficiency of algorithms of springback calculation. The finite element program Stampack has been used as a solver. It has capability of an explicit dynamic simulation of forming while the springback can be analysed using either an explicit dynamic or quasi-static implicit approach. Draw bending of a U profile has been used as a case study problem. Two methods of springback calculation have been compared, their advantages and disadvantages have been discussed. Numerical results have been verified by comparison with experimental data. The influence of selected numerical parameters on the accuracy and efficiency of the springback calculation has been investigated.

Cite as:

Lumelskyy, D., & Rojek, J. (2011). Numerical accuracy and efficiency of algorithms for springback calculation. Computer Methods in Materials Science, 11(2), 387 – 393. https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2011.2.0359

Article (PDF):

Keywords:

Springback, Explicit method, Implicit method, Metal forming

References:

Carden, W.D., Geng, L.M., Matlock, D.K., Wagoner, R.H., 2002, Measurement of springback, Int. J. Mech. ScL, 44, 79-101.

Chen, P., Koc, M., 2007, Simulation of springback variation informing of advanced high strength steels, J. Mater. Proc. Technol, 190, 189-198.

Firat, M., Mete Osman, H., Kocabicak, U., Ozsoy, M, 2010,Stamping process design using FEA in conjunction with orthogonal regression, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 46 (11), 992-1000

Geng, L.M., Wagoner, R.H., 2002, Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback, Int. J. Mech. ScL, 44 (1) 123-148.

Gronostajski, J., Gronostajski, Z., Matuszak, A., Niechajowicz, A., Zimniak, Z., 2001, Modern system for the sheet metalforming design, Proc. Conf. Advanced Materials Processing Technologies, AMPT ’01, Madrid, 907-914.

Laurent, H., Greze, R., Manach, P.Y., Thuillier, S., 2009, Influence of constitutive model in springback prediction using the split-ring test, Int. J. Mech. Sci, 51, 233-245.

Laurent, H., Greze, R., Oliveira, M.C., Menezes, L.F., Manach, P.Y., Alves, J.L., 2010, Numerical study of springback using the split-ring test for an AA5754 aluminum alloy, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 46 (9), 751-759.

Ofiate, E., Cendoya, P., Rojek, J., Miquel, J., 1996, A simple thin shell triangle with translational degrees of freedom for sheet stamping analysis, in: 3rd Int. Conf. on Numerical Simulation of 3-D Sheet Forming Processes, Numisheet 96, Dearborn, MI, USA. ,

Ofiate E., Cendoya, P., Rojek, J., Miquel, J., 1997, A simple thin shell triangle with translational degrees of freedom only, in: Atluri, S.N., Yagawa, G., (Eds.), Advances in Computational Engineering Science, Tech Science Press, 308-313.

Ofiate, E., Rojek, J., Garcia Garino, C, 1995, NUMISTAMP: A research project for assessment of finite element models for stamping processes, J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 50, 17-38.

Rojek, J., Jovicevic, J., Ofiate, E., 1996, Industrial applications of sheet stamping simulation using new finite element models. J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 60, 243-247.

Rojek, J., Ofiate, E., 1999, Sheet springback analysis using a simple shell triangle with translational degrees of freedom only, Int. J. Forming Processes, 1, 275-296.

Zimniak, Z., 2005, System wspomagania projektowania, zapewnienia jakości i diagnozowania procesów tłoczenia blach, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław (in Polish).