Applicability of decision trees in manufacturing industry

Applicability of decision trees in manufacturing industry

Marcin Perzyk, Robert Biernacki, Artur Soroczyński

Warsaw University of Technology, Institute of Materials Processing, Narbutta 85, 02-524 Warszawa.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2008.2.0189

Abstract:

In manufacturing companies large amounts of data are collected and stored, related to designs, products, equipment, materials, manufacturing processes etc. Utilization of that data for improvement of product quality and lowering manufacturing costs requires extraction of knowledge from the data, in the form of appropriate conclusions, rules, relationships and procedures. Data mining provides tools and methodologies for semi-automated extraction of that type of knowledge. It is a multidisciplinary field, rapidly growing in recent years, and used mainly in business, medicine, social sciences. Applications to manufacturing and design on a large scale are relatively seldom. In the present work some important manufacturing-related problems are characterized, from the standpoint of benefits from application of data mining methods. In the second part of the paper some selected results of the authors’ studies and research are presented, showing performance of decision trees in solving important typical problems in manufacturing industry.

Cite as:

Perzyk, M., Biernacki, R., Soroczyński, A., (2008). Applicability of decision trees in manufacturing industry. Computer Methods in Materials Science, 8(2), 70 – 78. https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2008.2.0189

Article (PDF):

Keywords:

Data mining, Manufacturing processes, Parameter significance, Statistical methods, Artificial neural networks

References:

Etchells, T.A., Lisboa, P.J.G., 2006, Orthogonal Search-Based Rule Extraction (OSRE) for Trained Neural Networks: A Practical and Efficient Approach, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 17, 374-384.

Harding, J.A., Shahbaz, M., Srinivas, Kusiak, A., 2006, Data mining in manufacturing: A review, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Trans. ASME, 128, 969–976.

Hill, T., Lewicki, P., 2007, Statistics Methods and Applications, StatSoft, Tulsa, OK.

Holzmüller, A., Wlodawer, R., 1953, Zehn Jahre Speiser-Einguss-Verfahren fur Gusseisen, Giesserei, 50, 781–791.

Huang, H., Wu, D., 2006, Product quality improvement analysis using data mining: A case study in ultra-precision manufacturing industry, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 3614LNAI, 577-580.

Kusiak, A., 2006, Data mining: manufacturing and service applications, Int. J. Production Research, 44, 4175–4191.

Perzyk, M., 2006, Data mining in foundry production, Research in Polish Metallurgy at the Beginning of XXI Century, ed., Świątkowski K., Committee of Metallurgy of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, 255-275.

Perzyk, M., Biernacki, R., Kozlowski, J., 2007, Data mining in manufacturing: methods, potentials, limitations, Proc. Conf. Advances in Production Engineering 2007, ed., Dąbrowski L., Warsaw, 147-156.

Perzyk, M., Kochański A., 2001, Prediction of ductile cast iron quality by artificial neural networks, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 109, 305–307.

Perzyk, M., Kochanski, A., Kozlowski, J., 2003, Relative importance of input signals of neural network, Computer Methods in Materials Science, 3, 172-179 (in Polish, English abstract).

Perzyk, M., Kozłowski, J., 2006, Comparison of statistical and neural networks-based methods in analysis of significance and interaction of manufacturing processes parameters, Computer Methods in Materials Science, 6, 81–93.

Perzyk, M., Soroczyński, A., Biernacki, R., 2008, Possibilities of decision trees applications for improvement of quality and economics of foundry production, submitted to Archives of Foundry Engineering.

Quinlan, J. R., 1987, Simplifying decision trees, Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 27, 221-234.

Vanderberg, H., Motroni S., 2007, PurpleInsight MineSet 3.2™ Reference Guide, available from www.purpleinsight.com/downloads/docs.shtml.

Wang, K., 2007, Applying data mining to manufacturing: The nature and implications, J. Intell. Manuf., 18, 487–495.