Optimisation strategies to determine process parameters in tube hydroforming
Rosa Di Lorenzo
, Giuseppe Ingarao, Fabrizio Micari
Università di Palermo, Dipartimento di Tecnologia Meccanica, Produzione e Ingegneria Gestionale, Palermo.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2007.3.0174
Abstract:
In tube hydroforming the concurrent actions of pressurized fluid and mechanical feeding allows to obtain tube shapes characterized by complex geometries such as different diameters sections and/or bulged zones. the main process parameters are material feeding history (i.e. the punches velocity history) and internal pressure path during the process. What is crucial in such processes is the proper design of operative parameters aimed to avoid defects (for instance underfilling or ductile fractures). In this paper, the authors propose the results of a wide research project on hydroforming of aluminium alloy tubes based on the utilisation of different optimisation strategies and aimed to prevent the typical process defects (underfilling and bursting).
Cite as:
Lorenzo, R., Ingarao, G., & Micari, F. (2007). Optimisation strategies to determine process parameters in tube hydroforming. Computer Methods in Materials Science, 7(3), 337 – 346. https://doi.org/10.7494/cmms.2007.3.0174
Article (PDF):

Keywords:
Tube hydroforming, Optimisation methods, Finite element method
References:
Ahmetoglu, M., Altan, T., 2000, Tube Hydroforming: State-of-the-art and Future Trends, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 98, 25-33.
Bonte, M.H.A., Van den Boogaard, A. H., Huètink, J., 2005, Metamodelling techniques for the optimisation of metal forming processes, Proc. 8th Esaform Conf., ed., Banabic, D., Cluj-Napoca, 155-158.
Boyd, S., Vandenberghe, L., 2004, Convex Optimisation, Cambridge University Press.
Di Lorenzo, R., Filice L., Umbrello, D., Micari, F., 2004(a), Optimal design of tube hydroforming processes: a fuzzy-logic-based approach, J. Engineering Manufacture – Part B, 218 – 6, 599-606.
Di Lorenzo, R., L. Filice, D. Umbrello, F. Micari, 2004(b), An integrated approach to the design of tube hydroforming processes: artificial intelligence, numerical analysis and experimental investigation, Proc. 8th NUMIFORM Conf., eds, Ghosh, S., Castro, J.M., Lee, J.K., Columbus, 1118-1123.
Di Lorenzo R., Corona V., Ingarao G. and Micari, F., 2005, Optimisation of a tube hydroforming process by gradient techniques, Proc. VII AITEM Conference.
Di Lorenzo R., Ingarao G., Micari F., 2006, Internal pressure and material feeding optimisation in tube hydroforming, Proc. 9th Esaform Conf., eds, Juster, N., Rosochowski, A., Glasgow, 383-386.
Fann, K., Hsiao, P., 2003, Optimisation of loading condition for tube hydroforming, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 140, 520-524.
Filice, L., Fratini, L., Micari, F., 2001, A simple experiment to characterise material formability in tube hydroforming, Annals of CIRP, 50, 181-184.
Gelin, J.C., Ghouati, O., Labergère, C., 2000, From Optimal Design to Control of Process in Sheet Forming and Tube Hydroforming, Proc. ECCOMAS Conf.
Gelin, J.C., Ghouati, O., Paquier, P., 1998, Modelling and Control of Hydroforming Processes for Flanges Forming, Annals of CIRP, 47, 213-216.
Gelin J.C., Labergère C., 2002, Application of optimal design and control strategies to the hydroforming of thin walled metallic tubes, Proc. 5th Esaform Conf., eds, Pietrzyk M., Mitura Z., Kaczmar J., Kraków, 699-702.
Imaninejad, M., Subhash, G., Lokus, A., 2005, Loading path optimization of tube hydroforming process, Int. J. Machine Tools & Manufacturing, 45, 1504-1514.
Jirathearanat, S., Altan, T., 2005, Optimization of loading paths for tube hydroforming, Proc. 8th ICTP, Verona (CD ROM).
Koc, M., Altan, T., 2002, Application of two dimensional (2D) FEA for the tube hydroforming process, Int. J. Machine Tools & Manufacturing, 42, 1285-1295.
Labergere, C., Gelin J.C., 2005, New strategies for optimal control of command laws for tube hydroforming processes, Proc. of 8th ICTP, Verona (CD ROM).
Li, B., Nye, T.Y., 2006, Multi-objective optimization of forming parameter for tube hydroforming process based on the Taguchi method, Int. J. Manuf. Techn., 28, 23-30.
Manabe, K., Suetake, M., Koyama, H., Yang, M., 2006, Hydroforming process optimization of aluminium alloy tube using intelligent control technique, Int. J. Machine Tools & Manufacturing, 46, 1207-1211.
Ray, P., Mac Donald, B.J., 2005, Intelligent control of tube hydroforming processes using finite element analysis, Proceedings of 8th ICTP, Verona (CD ROM).
Schmoeckel, D., Geiger, M., Hielscher, C., Huber, R., 1999, Metal Forming of Tubes and Sheets with Liquid and Other Flexible Media, Annals of CIRP, 48, 497-513.
Schmoeckel, D., Hessler, C., Engel, B., 1992, Pressure control in hydraulic tube forming, Annals of CIRP, 41, 311-314.
Sokolowski, T., Gerke, K., Ahmetoglu, M., Altan, T., 2000, Evaluation of Tube Formability and Material Characteristics: Hydraulic Bulge Testing of Tubes, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 98, 34-40.
Vollertsen, F., Prange, T., Sander, M., 1999, Hydroforming: Needs, Developments and Perspectives, Proc. 6th ICTP, 1197-1210.
Yang, J. Jeon, B., Oh, S., 2001, Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of hydroforming process, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 113, 666-672.
Yuan, S., Yuan, W., Wang X., 2006, Effect of wrinkling behaviour on formability and thickness distribution in tube hydroforming, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 177, 668-671.
Yuan S., Wang X., G Liu G., Wang Z.R., 2007, Control and use of wrinkles in tube hydroforming, J. Mat. Proc. Techn., 182, 6–11.